CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

December 2003

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Glen H MacDonald <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 16 Dec 2003 15:14:54 -0800
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (26 lines)
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Dear Jeremy,
The Neurotrace fluorescent nissl probes from Molecular Probes label nucleoli, along with any
other RNA in the cell.  You might counterstain with a DNA stain for double segmentation to
potentially avoid the need for a 1:1 relationship of nucleoli to nuclei.

Regards,
Glen
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Jeremy Adler wrote:

> Search the CONFOCAL archive at
> http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>
> Any suggestions for fluorophores that will highlight nucleoli in fixed
> and live tissue ?.
>
> assuming a 1:1 relationship of nucleoli to nuclei it should be easier to
> count nucleoli since they are smaller and less likely
> to appear to touch, which then creates problems for automated detection.
>
> Jeremy Adler
> CIAL
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2