CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

September 2006

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Vitaly Boyko <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 24 Sep 2006 12:19:08 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Dear List,

I have compared the photo bleaching of virus particles carrying YFP label in
TIRF (514 nm Argon laser line) with 1% n-propyl gallate in PBS/5% Ethanol
(no oxyrase) and the same sample mounted with ProlongGold and analyzed by
conventional wide-field microscopy. The pixel intensity was set to be
similar in TIRF versus the wide-field microscopy.

In theory, evanescent wave should not cause significant photo bleaching of
the fluorophore (especially of YFP that is rather photo stable). However,
the difference in YFP bleaching between the TIRF and wide-field imaging was
more than 3 fold. 

Does anyone has any experience with other anti-fading agents for TIRF, or
how to increase the solubility of n-propyl gallate in PBS (according to
Sigma, the highest concentration of n-propyl gallate in water is 0.35%)
without adding large amounts of glycerol (high N) or ethanol.

Best,

Vitaly
NCI-FREDERICK,
301-846-6575
   

ATOM RSS1 RSS2