CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

July 2018

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Giacomelli <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 25 Jul 2018 22:18:01 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (64 lines)
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Hi Rory,

8 KHz unidirectional or bidirectional (so 4 KHz fundamental)?  The 8 KHz
scanners are usually not that bad even at maximum amplitude because the 8
kHz tone is a lot harder to hear and essentially all the harmonics are out
of audible range.

For 4 KHz at larger deflection angles you either need hearing protection or
to really isolate it from the room.  A metal box around the scanner and a
window on the input port so that air cannot pass in/out of the scanner
helps a lot. This is how most commerical systems work.

I don't think the model matters; the noise comes from pushing air, so for a
given mirror size and deflection angle the noise power is going to be
almost constant.

Mike

On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 9:03 PM, Power, Rory <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
> *****
>
> Hi Confocalists,
>
> We’re trying to circumvent the annoyance of resonant mirrors screaming at
> 8 kHz. I was wondering whether anyone has a recommendation for constructing
> soundproof containment?
>
> Generally were using inexpensive resonant mirrors from EOPC:
> http://www.eopc.com/sc30.html
>
> Also, does anyone know whether the more costly resonant scanners used for
> confocal/multi-photon laser scanning microscopies are any better in this
> regard? Were not hugely concerned with other attributes (simply for light
> sheet microscopy stripe suppression) just the piercing noise.
>
> Many thanks in advance!
>
> Rory
>
> …………………………………………………………
>
> Dr. Rory Power
> Morgridge Institute for Research
> Medical Engineering | Huisken Lab
> 330 N Orchard St, Madison, WI, 53715
> Tel: 608 316 4554
> [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>
>
>
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2