Dear Axel:
> Olympus has nice long-working objectives with 160 mm tube length, but as
> mentioned previously in this group, they are not chromatically-corrected
> lenses like those o f Nikon, and so aren't the best or most compatible
> choice.  I'm sure that Nikon has some good or even great lenses with
> these specs.  I can tell you from personal experience that hte Olympus
> 20x and 40x lenses are really nice; very bright and produce great DIC
> images; so probably would be good on the right system.
>
> Good luck,
>
> Tony Moss
>
>
> On Tue, 19 Apr 1994, Axel Piepgras wrote:
>
> > Hi - does anyone have a recommendation for an objective to be used in a
> > physiological setup with CLSM that meets the specifications:
> > water immersion, working distance greater 1.2 mm, min x25 magn., NA 0.75
> > or better, and is not a Zeiss ICS (we need to use a Nikon microscope).
> > I heard rumours that Olympus recently presented a prototype - has anybody
> > seen it?
> > Thank you in advance, Axel Piepgras, Dept. of Neurosurgery, Klinikum
> > Mannheim/University of Heidelberg, Germany; phone: +49 (0)621 383
> > 3142/fax: +49 (0)621 383 2004
> >
>
> --- Saved internet headers (useful for debugging)
> >Received: by ucsd.edu; id RAA22359 sendmail 8.6.8.1/UCSD-2.2-sun Tue, 19 Apr
 19
> >Message-Id: <19
> >Received: from ARIZVM1.CCIT.ARIZONA.EDU by ucsd.edu for @ARIZVM1.CCIT.A
> >Received: from ARIZVM1.CCIT.ARIZONA.EDU (NJE origin LISTSERV@ARIZVM1) by
 ARIZVM
> >Date: Tue, 19 Apr 1994 18:07:46 -0500
> >Reply-To: Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
> >Sender:
> >From: Anthony G Moss <[log in to unmask]>
> >Subject
> >X-To: Confocal Microsco
> >X-cc: M
> >To: Multiple recipients of list CONFOCA
> >In-Reply-To: <[log in to unmask]>
> >X-CCaddr: Bcc: gordon chalmers AT som-bsb
> >X-CCadd
> >X-CCaddr: *To: <CONFOCA
>