CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

October 2007

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Nowell, Cameron" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 27 Oct 2007 11:08:29 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (77 lines)
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Hi Ann,
           To follow up from Julio's comments. The higher NA will give you improved resolution. A 1.42 NA object theoreticatly can resolve down to 210nm at 488nm exitation. That holds true for what ever the magnification the objective has. 
 
We have compared a 63x 1.42 NA to a 100x 1.42 NA objective. Both were Olympus UIS2 PlanApo objectives. Both could resolve the same structures. But the big difference was the amount of light that was needed to capture an image with the 100x objective. On average 7x more light input was required to get image with the 100x lens that was equivalent to the 63x lens. 
 
So my advice woudl be to get a 63x 1.42 NA objective, or better yet a 40x 1.4NA if you can find one (they are being made by Nikon i think but not sure about others).
 
Of course this is only important if you want to b e able to resolve very small structures. If you do not want to be resolving down to 210nm then your 40x oil and 63x water imersion objective will be just fine.
 
I can send you (and anyone else on the list) a copy of the reoprt with the comparison of the 63x vs the 100x lens if you want. 
 
 
Cheers
 
Cam
 
 
Cameron Nowell B.Sc (Hons)
Microscopy Imaging and Research Core Facility Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
7 St Andrews Place
East Melbourne, Victoria 3002

Phone: +61396561243
Mobile: +61422882700
Fax: +61396561411

________________________________

From: Confocal Microscopy List on behalf of Yang, Ann-Fook
Sent: Sat 27/10/2007 6:09 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Objective for confocal



Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Hi All,

I am new in confocal microscopy.
We have a 40x/1.3 oil and a 63X/1.2 water objectives. Is there any advantage to add a 100X/1.46 Oil objective?

Ann Fook Yang,
Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada/Agriculture et Agroalimentaire Canada
EM Unit/ Unite EM
Edifice K.W. Neatby Building,
960 Carling Av /960 Boulevard Carling,
Ottawa,Ontario
K1A 0C6

[log in to unmask]
Telephone/Téléphone: 613-759-1638
Facsimile/Télécopieur: 613-759-1701




This email (including any attachments) may contain 
confidential and/or legally privileged information and is 
intended only to be read or used by the addressee.  If you 
are not the intended addressee, any use, distribution, 
disclosure or copying of this email is strictly 
prohibited.  
Confidentiality and legal privilege attached to this email 
(including any attachments) are not waived or lost by 
reason of its mistaken delivery to you.
If you have received this email in error, please delete it 
and notify us immediately by telephone or email.  Peter 
MacCallum Cancer Centre provides no guarantee that this 
transmission is free of virus or that it has not been 
intercepted or altered and will not be liable for any delay 
in its receipt.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2