Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 27 May 2013 13:45:59 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****
Dear Listers and Guy,
Yes, you are right. Their original answer was just that the tubelens was
achromat so I was hoping someone knew more specifically. On your
suggestion, I pressed more and he said this:
"Our Product Manager has confirmed that the correction are made on both:
objective and tube lens."
So I guess their lenses aren't exchangeable with Nikon! Sad to hear.
Thank you,
Pedro Almada
On 24 May 2013 10:45, Guy Cox <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Demand a definitive answer from Leica. You are spending big money here
> and obviously back at Wetzlar there is someone who can answer your
> question. From what I have heard, only Nikon state definitively that all
> corrections are done in the objective, but I would be very interested to
> hear any further information.
>
> Guy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Pedro Almada
> Sent: Friday, 24 May 2013 6:45 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Objective Corrections by Maker
>
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> *****
>
> Dear list members,
>
> This another non confocal question but I believe it fits the interests of
> the list. We're trying to find out if Leica does any of the corrections for
> it's objectives on the tube lens. We've heard that Olympus and Nikon do all
> corrections on the objective itself but Zeiss requires the correct tube
> lens. Is this accurate? I've asked our Leica rep but he couldn't answer.
>
> The reason we're asking is that we have a Nikon body but we're very
> interested in a specific Leica lens. They use the same thread and tube
> focal distance, only the parfocal distance is different and we can live
> with that...
>
> Any insight is appreciated!
>
> Best,
> Pedro Almada
>
|
|
|