Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 8 Nov 1994 16:27:34 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Tue, 8 Nov 1994, Anthony G Moss wrote:
> I use Papyrus. It's not windows based but that's not really necessary.
> It works very well, automatically ports in lit lists in a pretty
> seamless manner. It's certainly the right price ($99) and has an
>
> On Mon, 7 Nov 1994, Alan R. Hibbs wrote:
>
> > To all confocal list subscribers,
> >
> > What program are people using for keeping track of references? I know this
> > question is not directly related to confocal microscopy, but I'm sure most
Note for Macintosh users:
Niles and Associates have just published a new version of their excellent
EndNote Plus (& EndLink to import from various on-line sources).
EndNote is worth trying with its new features. With some of the most
popular word processors it works from within the wrod processor so that
you do not have to switch between the reference manager program and your
word processor.
Harry Kujari, M.D.
......................................................................
Harry Kujari, MD tel: +358-21-633 7231 Dept of Pathology
Dept of Pathol tel: +358-21-633 7016 MediCity Research Lab.
Univ of Turku fax: +358-21-633 7000 MediCity Reasecrh Lab.
FIN-20520 TURKU tel: +358-400-864 482 mobile
......................................................................
|
|
|