CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

May 1992

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Michael Cammer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 20 May 1992 13:04:19 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
>
> Has there been any validation experiment done to determine if there is
> compression of thick tissue specimens (100-200 microns) during confocal
> imaging with oil-immersion lenses (40/60/100X)?  I am imaging spinal cord
> sections of 150 microns, and the neurons in them are distributed all across
> the thickness of a section.  I am interested in determining if the estimates
> of thickness that I get for neurons on one side of the section are affected
> by any compression of the tissue by the advancing objective during data
> collection.
>
> Any input is greatly appreciated.
>
I instruct anybody who uses our confocal to put a spacer between the
cover slip and slide so that any cells or tissue will not undergo the
force of said advance of objective.
-MC
 
--

ATOM RSS1 RSS2