Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 20 Sep 2013 13:48:09 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****
Indeed - I'd like to second that question.
Right now I'm using 850nm for mTurq2. This may be suboptimal, though.
Well: I should probably just test it.
Tobias
-----Original Message-----
From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Cameron, Lisa
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 15:40
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: 2-photon excitation wavelength recommendations for mTurq2 and clover
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****
Hello -
Have people tested and found optimal 2-photon laser excitation wavelengths for some of the newer fluorophores like mTurquoise2 and Clover?
I'd be interested to hear what people have tried / found.
Our specific application is FLIM-FRET.
We do the measurements with a Becker & Hickl time domain system on a Zeiss 710 with 2p laser.
Thank you for any information -
Lisa
---------------------------------------
Lisa Cameron, Ph.D.
Director of Confocal and Light Microscopy Core Dana Farber Cancer Institute
450 Brookline Ave.; JF 621
Boston, MA 02215
http://microscopy.dfci.harvard.edu
The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly dispose of the e-mail.
|
|
|