CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

May 2019

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Eric Lubeck <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 29 May 2019 09:15:00 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Hello,

I'm curious to hear if anyone has experience with this setup and can
compare it to the performance of the CSU-W1 or the Andor Dragonfly using
100 mW laser launches.  In theory this setup is exciting because of the
combination of the high power laser launch (1W), a similar emission pathway
to the W1 (but sealed around the disc), and the low cost of a micro-lensed
spinning disc.

Has anyone validated similar emission performance to the higher end systems
(dragonfly, yokogawa)?  In practice what kind of light throughputs actually
get to the objective with this system?  Are there any other gotchas with
this setup?

Thanks,
Eric

ATOM RSS1 RSS2