Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 24 May 1999 15:55:05 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
To: Alberto and the list....
MME would be happy to collect this list and publish it.
If your organization has any sort of chart or rating system, please fax or
email it to me here at the MME office.
Thanks,
Barbara Foster
Consortium President
Microscopy/Microscopy Education ...Educating microscopists for greater
productivity.
125 Paridon Street Suite 102 Springfield, MA 01118
PH: (413)746-6931 FX: (413)746-9311 email: [log in to unmask]
Visit our web site <http://www.MME-Microscopy.com/education>
******************************************************
MME is America's first national consortium providing
customized on-site workshops in all areas of
microscopy, sample preparation, and image analysis.
At 06:32 AM 5/21/99 +0200, Alberto Diaspro wrote:
>It should be nice to have a collection of decision parametrs
>to apply. I mean a sort of rating for main parts of the instrument,
>the way one candecide if one image is better than another one and, why
>not, psf data. I think the confocal group could try to elaborate
>such a thing. For example, I appreciated and I still apreciate very much
>in the book by Jim Pawley the section starting on page581 of the 95
>edition related to comparison.
>So, my proposal to this group is to find out the way for updating Pawley's
>data and to introduce more parameters that can help people in evaluation.
>Bye
>Alby
>
>Alberto Diaspro
>Department of Phyiscs
>University of Genoa
>Via Dodecaneso 33
>16146 Genova ITALY
>voice +39-10-3536426/309/358
>facsimile +39-10-314218
>e-mail: [log in to unmask]
>
>
|
|
|