CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

May 2014

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gerhard Holst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 21 May 2014 08:21:35 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Hi Loralei,

sorry, my misunderstanding. Yes, it is correct that the USB 3.0 limits the data transfer rate, therefore there are the Camera Link sCMOS camera models as well. If then the smaller chip is compared to the larger ones, one have to know that the smaller one corresponds to one half of the larger chips, which means it  has one rolling shutter instead of the two of the larger ones, which is the reason why the larger sensors, if a ROI with the same resolution as the smaller one is used, are always double as fast. But I guess you might know that already.


with best regards,
Gerhard
_______________________________

Dr. Gerhard Holst
Science & Research
PCO AG
Donaupark 11
93309 Kelheim, Germany
fon +49 (0)9441 2005 36
fax +49 (0)9441 2005 20
mob +49 (0)172 711 6049
[log in to unmask]
www.pco.de


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] Im Auftrag von Loralei Dewe
Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Mai 2014 20:19
An: [log in to unmask]
Betreff: Re: AW: Anyone compared recently released sCMOS? (PCO 4.2 / Zyla 4.2 / Flash4 V2)?

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Hi Gerhard,

I never said the optiMOS uses a USB 3.0 interface. It does not, it uses a
camera link card similar to the pco.edge.  What I did say was that the
sCMOS that do use a USB 3.0 connection will not be able to run faster than
30-40 fps.

Cheers,
Loralei


On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 7:18 AM, Stanislav Vitha <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
> *****
>
> I just looked at the optiMOS specs, it uses a proprietary camera interface,
> not USB3. The company also recommends to use a solid state disk for
> storage, in order to sustain the data transfer rate.
>
>
> Stan Vitha
> Microscopy and Imaging Center
> Texas A&M University
>
>
>
> =================================
> Subject: AW: Anyone compared recently released sCMOS? (PCO 4.2 / Zyla
> 4.2 / Flash4 V2)?
> From: Gerhard Holst <[log in to unmask]>
> Reply-To: Confocal Microscopy List
> <[log in to unmask]>
> Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 09:07:04 +0200
> Content-Type: text/plain
>
>
> Hi Loralei,
>
> I would like to know if the optiMOS is really capable of transferring the
> 1920 x 1080 pixel 16 bit data via USB 3.0. If I am not mistaken, then we
>
> with best regards,
>
> Gerhard
>
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2