CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

December 2003

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Christian <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 4 Dec 2003 06:46:21 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

The only experience and rumors I have had and heard involve conjugation
problems.  The dots work great, it's just tough to pay enough out to
give enough to work out the conj problems.  I guess I'm saying they're
too expensive to fool with and the conjugation problems are many.

I'd like to hear anything anyone else has to say on the subject.

Christian Elowsky
Ross Confocal Facility Manager
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine


--- Linda Steer <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Search the CONFOCAL archive at
> http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>
> Hello:
>
> Has anyone employed the Qdot (quantum dots) technology in any of
> their
> staining protocols especially in tissue sections ? Care to comment
> ?????
>
> Thanks
> Linda Steer
> Dept. of Otolaryngology
> SUNY Upstate Medical University
> Syracuse, NY


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
http://companion.yahoo.com/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2