CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

April 2011

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kurt Thorn <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 29 Apr 2011 09:49:16 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

  It's possible it's an upconverting phosphor that absorbs two infrared 
photons and emits one visible photon.

On 4/29/2011 8:42 AM, Craig Brideau wrote:
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> *****
>
> It emits the same color of green, at least by my eye.  This would make sense
> if it was an anti-stokes material.  Excitation wavelength shouldn't alter
> emission wavelength of a stokes shift process, either up or down, correct?
>
> Craig
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 1:31 AM, Jeremy Adler<[log in to unmask]>wrote:
>
>> *****
>> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
>> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
>> *****
>>
>>   what happens when you shift the excitation wavelength ?
>>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2