Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 11 May 1998 13:47:16 -0500 |
Content-Type: | TEXT/PLAIN |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Is it possible that your flurochrome is self-shading? Also, with DIC or
any other method you are likely to see less useful detail deeper into a
cell, than at the surface, because of the buildup of background
out-of-focus detail compared to the surface. Unless a clearing agent is
used, this will just be a matter of thickness of the sample. Birefringent
starch grains are of course a nuisance to any polarization based imaging,
like DIC.
*************************************************************************
* *
* Anthony Moss voice (334)844-9257 *
* 101 Cary Hall fax (334)844-4065 *
* Zoology and Wildlife Science email [log in to unmask] *
* Auburn University *
* Auburn, AL 36849 *
* *
*************************************************************************
On Mon, 11 May 1998, Jette Wendt-Larsen wrote:
> Dear confocalists,
> When I scan spherical (diam. 10 um) cell along the z-axis
> the intensity and sharpness decreases in the lower z-planes
> and often the bottom part is not visible at all. This has
> happened with several fluorocromes and independent of the
> distance of the cell to the coverslip. The same is seen when
> more flattened cells (5 um thick) are imaged.
> The decrease appears as soon as the equator of the cell is
> passed and becomes more prominent with z.
> The blurring is also seen when I use Nomarski in brightfield.
> The cells contain big starch grains, which are birefringent
> structures and not labelled.
> To me it does not look like an effect of refractive index
> mismatch between immersion oil-water medium, but perhaps between
> immersion oil-starch.
> Any help will be very appreciated since 3-D imaging of whole
> cells is twice as informative than of half cells!
>
> Best regards Jette
>
|
|
|