Jim Walker and I are presently working on a manual for evaluating confocal
instrumentation and peripheral equipment for purchase. We are both in a
neutral position having worked in research laboratories and for confocal
manufacturers. We are trying to be unbiased in our approach.
 
Over the years I have seen a great deal of confusion and misunderstanding in
the process of purchasing confocal systems. Every company has a good product
that will provide the needs of specific users. It is the sorting out of all
of the points for consideration that is complex; i.e. scan rates, computer
platforms. file formats, image analysis, hardcopy output, lasers, etc.
Service is a major issue, again, both for the user and the manufacturer.
We presently have 36 major issues for consideration.
 
It is not our intent to make any statements about one instrument or another.
We would like to provide an organized approach to evaluating what is
available. In an effort to be unbiased I am in the process of requesting
from each manufacturers' Product Manager a list of what they consider to be
the positive points of their instruments. These points would be included but
not labled as to manufacturer.
 
My reason for addressing this forum is that I would also like to solicit
points of consideration from several users. Everyone has their own
priorities. In addition I would also be interested in short protocols that
labs have used in evaluating systems for their needs. These would include
what many have already discussed on this forum; i.e. tests for various types
of resolution, registration, distortions, etc. I would include these in an
appendix along with the author if desired. I will also aknowledge all of
those that provide information, both manufacturers and users.
 
After putting this information together we will have it printed as
inexpensively as possible and then work out some form of distribution. I am
open for suggestions.
 
Rather than clutter up the forum I would suggest that anyone interested in
sharing their ideas send e-mail to me directly or call or write.
 
Clyde N. Lulham
>INTERNET:[log in to unmask]
P.O. Box 589
Graham, Wa. 98338
(206)847-9128