Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 13 Oct 2011 14:25:51 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****
Hello Marc: We have realized some blind unmixing, almost always we use this function, you have to select the number of expected channels in order for this to work better, sometimes a change in the width of the spectral capture also helps, so we used a combination of opening the confocal aperture with a shorter step size, 5nm or 2nm depending on the distance between peaks of the dyes involved, and a band width at 7nm or less, this usually compensates when we see a low emission on the sample. I hope this helps Gabriel OH
> Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 10:55:21 -0400
> From: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: blind unmixing
> To: [log in to unmask]
>
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> *****
>
> HI,
>
> We are experiencing some difficulties doing blind unmixing with the Olympus
> FV100 on double-orange beads.
>
> Have someone been successful with this technique ? If not, we could also
> enter the spectral data of the 2 fluorophores to do normal unmixing, but
> this too seems problematic. Any info or protocol would be enormously
> appreciated.
>
> Thank you very much in advance.
>
> Marc
>
>
>
>
>
> Marc Thibault, PhD
>
> Chemical Engineering Department
>
> Ecole Polytechnique of Montreal
>
> tel: (514) 340-4711 ext.3968
>
>
>
>
|
|
|