CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

July 2013

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 6 Jul 2013 09:00:05 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

Sorry, I got into that message series a bit late and didn't see the earlier posts.  You are quite right that an AOD should be really quite effective in 2-photon.  I don't know of any current application but I agree that it looks really promising.  

                                                                      Guy

-----Original Message-----
From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Christian Wilms
Sent: Saturday, 6 July 2013 6:41 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: AOD v Resonant scanner

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

> An AOD (as used in the old Noran systems) is highly chromatic and so cannot be used in fluorescence.  AOD based fluorescence systems (Lasertek, Noran) have used  the equivalent of slit, rather than spot, detection.  

This shouldn't make a difference when using non-descanned detection with a single excitation line (e.g. 2P excitation), or am I missing something obvious?

Cheers, Chris

ATOM RSS1 RSS2