*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Alison, how is this better than sub-resolution beads?

Sincerely,
Fred


Fred E. Indig, Ph.D.
Head, Confocal Imaging Facility

Biomedical Research Center (BRC) Rm 8B135
National Institute on Aging/NIH
251 Bayview Blvd.
Baltimore, MD  21224-6825

Tel. 410-558-8173
Fax  410-558-8236
[log in to unmask] 

________________________________________
From: Alison North [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 3:39 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Standards for SIM resolution

*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****

Hi Josh,

We have used both the SIM nanorulers to check our OMX and the 80RG PAINT
nanorulers to check our STORM system.  Both work well though they can be
a bit tricky to find at first.  We have had less luck yet with the STORM
nanorulers in solution, so I would be interested to hear if anybody has
worked out the kinks for that sample!
Give me a call if you want to talk about it,

Best,
Alison

On 3/1/2016 2:42 PM, Joshua Zachary Rappoport wrote:
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
> *****
>
> Does anyone have a good recommended standard for SIM resolution?
> Has anyone tried these?
> http://www.gattaquant.com/products/gatta-sim-nanoruler.html
>
> Thanks!
>
> Josh