CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

November 2006

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bill Miller <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 15 Nov 2006 07:25:00 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

One solution to the small image size is to use a camera with many 
more pixels - see http://www.lumenera.com - they have a 21mpix camera 
and will soon have a 30mpix one as well.

At 01:00 PM 11/15/2006 +0100, you wrote:
>Search the CONFOCAL archive at
>http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>
>We are having difficulties with a Quad Viewer from Optical Insights. 
>It splits and output image into 4 and allows for 4 emission filters. 
>The attraction is that you can get 4 images concurrently on a 
>widefield system, and potentially on a spinning disk confocal. The 
>downside is that the images are small.
>
>Our problem is that we see shading in one corner of the whole image, 
>Optical Insights assure us that this is a problem limited to Zeiss 
>microscopes but have yet to solve the problem.
>
>What experiences do other users have with this potentially 
>attractive equipment, especially on Zeiss microscopes ?.
>
>
>Jeremy Adler
>Cell Biology
>The Wenner-Gren Inst.
>Arrhenius Laboratories E5
>Stockholm University
>Stockholm 106 91
>Sweden
>
>________________________________

ATOM RSS1 RSS2