CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

November 1996

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Menczel Laszlo <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 18 Nov 1996 10:17:57 MET
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Why don't we (I mean the confocal group) organize an opinion poll?
Then we could send the results to the OEMs. I for one would like to
see some decent software for our microscope, and definitely *not*
under Windows of any kind (I don't like to be taken for an imbecile
who cannot use a computer without a dozen silly icons on the screen).
 
Laszlo Menczel
LSM Laboratory
Biological Research Center
Szeged, Hungary
 
> Isn't it important that the OEM's not get fooled (like the public)
> with MS and other flavors of hype?  Could that be a useful purpose
> of this discussion ?
 
Bryan Crawford wrote:
 
> This will only happen if the OEM's and their contracted software
> developers are listening to the users rather than (or at least
> as well as) Microsoft.  I have had this converstation with Zeiss
 
... some stuff deleted ...
 
> have to both be aware of it, and consider it signifigant.  How
> we might achieve these ends is an open question.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2