CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

August 2008

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Valarie McGarty <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 4 Aug 2008 13:24:05 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (37 lines)
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Greetings!

I am fixing monolayers of cells on coverslips that have the "appearance" of 
being sheets of cells perhaps overgrowing one another.  Confocal study did 
not show more than one layer of cells.

I fixed the cells in 3.7% formaldehyde followed by methanol/acetone 
perforation.  I used aquapolymount for mounting.

Perhaps you all could help me with some questions:

Would the fixation method cause the cell layer(s) to collapse?  What is an 
alternative?  

Is it possible for the cells to appear crosshatched and not be overlapping 
significantly - just cytoplasm perhaps?  I was trying to tell mainly by looking at 
nuclei.

I've seen a lot of talk about building inserts to prevent the cells from being 
compressed - and have also been told it doesn't matter.  What's the opinion 
here?

If I use nail polish on freshly mounted coverslips, or even after they've "set" 
for an hour or two, unpredictably the end result is that the cells are sucked 
off the coverslip into the polish.  Is this the brand of polish (hard as nails) or 
some result of a combination of polish and mount solution?  Has anyone else 
had this happen?  Is it an excess of mounting solution?

I would appreciate any help here - I'm pretty new to imaging.

Thank you,

Valarie McGarty  B.S.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2