CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

July 2013

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
AOD v Resonant scanner
From:
"Laevsky, Gary S." <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 5 Jul 2013 13:26:10 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines) 
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

Hi All,

This would be for a MP application, so descanning is not an issue.

I would think resonant galvos would be superior on the throughput side, whereas an AOD would win on speed and control (imagine, a trade-off).

Thanks in advance for your feedback.




Best,

Gary



Gary Laevsky, Ph.D.
Confocal Imaging Facility Manager
Dept. of Molecular Biology
Washington Rd.
Princeton University
Princeton, New Jersey, 08544-1014
(O) 609 258 5432
(C) 508 507 1310

ATOM RSS1 RSS2