Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 28 Oct 2015 16:40:55 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
*****
Hi Jens,
pls have a look on science.duel.life. There is a broad and detailed
overview about cons/pro of sCMOS/CCD cams, as well as EMCCD and ICCD.
http://science.duel.life/index.php/compare-instruments/cameras
(Its a commercially independent source)
Best Regards, Larisa
Am 28.10.2015 um 11:33 schrieb Jens-Bernhard Bosse:
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> Post images on http://www.imgur.com and include the link in your posting.
> *****
>
> Dear Listers,
>
> I have to pick your brains again:
>
> What would be your suggestion for a mid-range camera used mainly for fixed immunofluorescence and some stronger fluorescent protein labeling in living cells at mid speed (100 ms and up).
> I would be especially interested if you would choose sCMOS over CCD here.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jens
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Dr. Jens Bernhard Bosse
> Heinrich-Pette-Institut
> Leibniz-Institut für Experimentelle Virologie
> Martinistrasse 52
> Hamburg 20251
> Germany
>
> [log in to unmask]
>
>
> This electronic communication, including any attached documents, may contain confidential and/or legally privileged information that is intended only for use by the recipient(s) named above. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the communication and any attachments.
|
|
|