CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

April 2010

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Pitrone <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 29 Apr 2010 13:18:45 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Hey Stu,

Buy a 10x/0.45 or Pete's sake!

Pete 

On Apr 29, 2010, at 12:50 PM, stu_the_flat wrote:

> Hello 
> 
> In our lab, we have a two-photon microscope that has 10x NA 0.3 and a 40x NA
> 0.8 objective. 
> 
> Recently some people in our lab have taken to using the 10x objective. I
> calculate the point spread function is going to be 18.5µm! That is not
> taking into account the tissue scattering effects (that I don’t know how to
> calculate) 
> 
> Can this set up just be thought of taking very broad optical section system
> or are there other things to take into consideration? 
> 
> Many thanks 
> 
> Stuart
> -- 
> View this message in context: http://confocal-microscopy-list.588098.n2.nabble.com/Two-photon-imaging-with-low-NA-objectives-tp4979404p4979404.html
> Sent from the Confocal Microscopy List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2