I would like access to such a list,
thanks
 
Stefan Dolk
>
>
>
>>On Wed, 8 Feb 1995, MARSHALL H. MONTROSE wrote:
>>
>>> I started a discussion about compiling confocal references a little while
>>> ago. The replies suggested everyone thought it was worthwhile, but not
>>> easy, to maintain a "vendor-specific" list of publications. In fact,
>>> publications from ALL uses of the confocal might be more helpful for
>>> investigators. I would therefore like to take a poll about a related service
>>> I could perform for the newsgroup.
>>>         I subscribe to Current Contents on-line and every week we run
>>> searches to scan the latest update. I would be happy to
>>> search "confocal", upload the resultant reference list, and post it to the
>>> newsgroup weekly. This topic brings up about 15-25 references
>>> per week and files are 10,000 to 15,000 bytes.
>>>         I do not want to do this if the group thinks it is inappropriate or
>>> just plain uninteresting. So how do we take a vote on the internet? Maybe
>>> the best is to post a brief note saying if you want it or not: that way I
>>> can still distribute the list to those who want it, even if there are a
>>> large number of declining voices.
>>>         After I post this note, I will also upload the latest search and
>>> send it as an example of what I am talking about.
>>>
>>> Chip Montrose
>>> Johns Hopkins Univ.
********************************************************
    Stefan Dolk
    Department of Physiology
    Gvteborg University
    Medicinaregatan 11
    413 90 Gvteborg, Sweden
    E-mail:[log in to unmask]
    Phone# +46 31 773 35 17
    Fax# +46 31 773 35 12
********************************************************