Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 6 Mar 1997 03:32:32 +0900 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>I have been using Adobe Photoshop 3.0. for the processing of my
>confocal/epifluorescence/TEM/SEM images. Does anybody know what extras the
>updated version (Photoshop 4.0) offers? Is it worth purchasing for someone
>who does "strictly scientific" image processing ( I have no doubt that the
>new version offers lot more for "digital artists"). Thanks for your input.
Three points for scientists:
1: Batch processing
Now you can let Photoshop learn certain routine processes so
that it can perform them automatically. Although it was possible
to do this using a third-party plug in with Photoshop 3, Adobe's
integration of this feature is more intuitive and simpler to use.
If you want to raise the contrast -> unsharp-mask of a 100-picture
stack, this is a real boon.
2: Non-distructive contrast/tone/colour adjustment
Using the new "adjustment layer" you can modify the contrast,
tone and colours without changing the original data. Thus, you can
try different settings much more easily.
3: More format for web pictures
Now you have more options to save pictures with formats commonly
used for web publications.
Kei
|
|
|