CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

March 1997

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"ITO, Kei" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 6 Mar 1997 03:32:32 +0900
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
>I have been using Adobe Photoshop 3.0. for the processing of my
>confocal/epifluorescence/TEM/SEM images. Does anybody know what extras the
>updated version (Photoshop 4.0) offers? Is it worth purchasing for someone
>who does "strictly scientific" image processing ( I have no doubt that the
>new version offers  lot more for "digital artists"). Thanks for your input.

Three points for scientists:

1: Batch processing
        Now you can let Photoshop learn certain routine processes so
        that it can perform them automatically. Although it was possible
        to do this using a third-party plug in with Photoshop 3, Adobe's
        integration of this feature is more intuitive and simpler to use.
        If you want to raise the contrast -> unsharp-mask of a 100-picture
        stack, this is a real boon.

2: Non-distructive contrast/tone/colour adjustment
        Using the new "adjustment layer" you can modify the contrast,
        tone and colours without changing the original data. Thus, you can
        try different settings much more easily.

3: More format for web pictures
        Now you have more options to save pictures with formats commonly
        used for web publications.

Kei

ATOM RSS1 RSS2