CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

June 1994

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: slidemakers
From:
Tom Phillips <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 1 Jun 1994 09:06:27 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines) 
I have noted a lot of users are refering to using the Polaroid CI-5000.
Does anyone else think it is stupid that Polaroid only includes its own
film and generic ISO 100 & 200 as choices?  Wouldn't it be nice if we could
get them to acknowledge many of their users would prefer ISO64 film or
shooting black & white tech pan at ISO 50?  it is somewhat limiting having
to play with brighter/darker setting.  I have bitched to the reps at
Polaroid (1-800-225-1618) and encourage everyone else to give them a ring.
 
Thomas E. Phillips, Ph.D.
Associate Professor of Biological Sciences
Director, Molecular Cytology Core Facility
3 Tucker Hall
University of Missouri
Columbia, MO 65211
(314)-882-4712 (voice)
(314)-882-0123 (fax)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2