CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

August 1992

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Martin W. Wessendorf" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 27 Aug 1992 09:28:13 CDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
In message     Confocal Microscopy List writes:
>    We have recently been using the confocal microscope to examine
> colocalization of two proteins using MAb techniques. The signal level from
> one of the proteins is lower than the other by ca. a factor of 2-3.
> I am sure that many of you have observed that using such data it is possible
> by judicious selection of the intensities of the display colors (one for
> each protein) it is possible to make it appear that the proteins are
> colocalized or are not colocalized. The question is how does one establish
> 'reality'?
>     At first we assumed that if you could adjust the balance to show that
> they were colocalized then they were colocalized since for features that are
> not colocalized in our controls it is not possible to adjust the color scales
> to show colocalization. The problem with this assumption is that in more
> highly
> stained and thicker material, such as that with which we are working, there
> may be a sufficient level of out of focal plane signal contributing to our
> structures' signal. This structure might then be interpreted to be colocalized
> when it is not. Any ideas?
>
> Jim
 
I have 3 questions for you, first:
 
1)  what fluorophores are you using?
 
2)  Are you using an Ar-ion laser?
 
3)  If you're using a Kr/Ar-ion laser, are you trying to collect red and green
images simultaneously?
 
RSVP!
 
Best wishes,
 
Martin Wessendorf

ATOM RSS1 RSS2