CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

August 2008

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Adrian Smith <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 14 Aug 2008 07:13:25 +0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

On 14/08/2008, at 4:44 AM, Nowell, Cameron wrote:

>           I owuld like to disagree with Craig. There are now quite a  
> few programs that use the graphics card to process 3D data in real  
> time now. MetaMorph, Imaris, Volocity, 3D Studio, Olympus FV1000,  
> Leica LAS AF just to name a few.
>
> There is an enourmous ammount of choice out there in the graphics  
> card market, but my recomendation (and the recomendation of many  
> other people) is to buy the best GAMING card you can afford. While  
> each graphics card manuafacturer has "Workstation" class cards that  
> cost a heap of money, these cards oare not really any better than a  
> good gaming card. So avoid things like the Nvidia Quadro, ATI  
> FirePro or Wildcat Studio type of cards.


Here is a recent "value" analysis of gaming cards...

http://www.dansdata.com/askdan00034.htm

Adrian

ATOM RSS1 RSS2