CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

May 2008

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"MODEL, MICHAEL" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 6 May 2008 21:10:53 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Hi Pedro: 
 
If you are using an inverted scope then the areas close to the bottom are less affected by spherical aberration and scattering. That's why they should be brighter.
 
Mike
 

________________________________

From: Confocal Microscopy List on behalf of Pedro Camello
Sent: Tue 5/6/2008 6:44 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Strange artifact in z series



Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Hi all,

while performing z sections of mitochondria-stained living cells, Iīm
finding that the bottom part of the cell displays a brighter mitochondria
fluoresecence, showing more contrast respect to cytosol than mitochondria in
the top part of the cell. My system scans z from bottom to top. If it were
simple bleaching due to laser light passing through the cell, I should
observe that the bottom mitochondria are also less stained in a second
series, but thatīs not the case (the difference between top and bottom still
there)
Any idea to explain it?

Thanks

Pedro

ATOM RSS1 RSS2