CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

September 2006

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Barbara Foster <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 7 Sep 2006 16:57:07 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (101 lines)
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Hi, again

Yes, as a microscopy teacher for over 25 years, I strongly agree.  I 
have personally tested this system with a resolution target below 
90nm.  Similar tests are on the Cytoviva website.

-B

At 11:55 PM 9/6/2006, Mark Cannell wrote:
>Search the CONFOCAL archive at
>http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>
>I think that one needs to be careful about the term resolution. 
>There is a huge
>difference between detection and resolution. After all, it is easy to detect
>distant stars but (generally) none of them are actually resolved.
>
>Regards Mark
>
>Quoting Barbara Foster <[log in to unmask]>:
>
> > Search the CONFOCAL archive at
> > http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
> >
> > Hi, Lars
> >
> > Before trying all the fancy stuff like TIRF, etc, there are two other
> > alternatives that I would investigate:
> > a. CytoViva (which pushes the resolution of light microscopy well
> > below 100nm - HONESTLY!), now comes equipped with a version to work
> > with fluorescence.  The results have been impressive (see
> > www.cytoviva.com).  CytoViva also has the ability to optically
> > section, which I think you might find helpful in this
> > application.  (By the way, CytoViva just won an R&D 100 award this year)
> > b. I also had a chance to work some time back with a client in Europe
> > who has invented an intriguing slide apparatus that creates a
> > localized plasmon field  that gives results similar to TIRF with less
> > hassle (www.lumiscence.com).
> >
> > Hope this is helpful,
> >
> > Barbara Foster
> >
> > Microscopy/Microscopy Education
> > 313 S Jupiter Rd, Suite 100
> > Allen, TX 75002
> > P: 972-954-8011
> > W: www.MicroscopyEducation.com
> >
> >
> > MME is now scheduling customized, on-site courses through
> > December.  Call us today for details.
> >
> > P. S.
> > Need a good general reference or light microscopy text for the Fall
> > semester? Call us today to learn more about "Optimizing LIght
> > Microscopy".  Copies still available through MME... even for
> > class-room lots ... and we give quantity discounts. Call Ken Piel at
> > (972)954-8011.
> >
> > At 11:46 AM 9/7/2006, Engstrom, Lars wrote:
> > >Search the CONFOCAL archive at
> > >http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
> > >Hello all -
> > >Does anyone have experience imaging DiI-LDL in live cells with
> > >either wide field or confocal?
> > >We have had some success w/ incubating at 4C prior to imaging.
> > >We are mostly interested at what's happening at the membrane. When
> > >imaged w/ FM 4-64 we see some co-localization with the DiI-LDL but
> > >the far majority is not.
> > >We are having difficulty resolving the DiI-LDL at early time points.
> > >I've found some clathrin-mediated endocytosis papers using labeled
> > >LDL, a GFP-fusion to clathrin and confocal. I also found a couple
> > >papers using TIRF, is that a better platform to be using?
> > >Another lab is working on making some fusion vectors/proteins but I
> > >wanted to get a start on the imaging while waiting for them.
> > >Any suggestions on approach would be appreciated.
> > >Thanks for your time.
> > >-Lars
> > >
> > >
> > >----------
> > >LEGAL NOTICE
> > >Unless expressly stated otherwise, this message is confidential and
> > >may be privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. Access
> > >to this E-mail by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not an
> > >addressee, any disclosure or copying of the contents of this E-mail
> > >or any action taken (or not taken) in reliance on it is unauthorized
> > >and may be unlawful. If you are not an addressee, please inform the
> > >sender immediately.
> >
>
>
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2