CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

October 2007

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Nowell, Cameron" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 3 Oct 2007 07:14:21 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (87 lines)
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Hi Donald,
          I can see no need for anyone to purchase a older style video
camera instead of a new CCD. The new CCDs have the features you
mentioned, plus increased resolution and if you have the right camera an
ability to capture data at high frame rates (to do full motion video).
Though I can not think of many instances where you would need to capture
anythign in real time. All the "movies" we do here are captured anywhere
from 1 frame every minute to 1 frame every hour.


That being said we still have a couple of scopes with older style video
cameras on them (though I am pretty sure they are CCD based as well)
that we use for demonstating disections on.


Cheers

Cam


Cameron Nowell B.Sc (Hons)

Microscopy Imaging and Research Core Facility Peter MacCallum Cancer
Centre
7 St Andrews Place
East Melbourne, Victoria 3002

Phone: +61396561243
Mobile: +61422882700
Fax: +61396561411



-----Original Message-----
From: Confocal Microscopy List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Donald M. O'Malley
Sent: Wednesday, 3 October 2007 7:02 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: video vs. CCD cameras

Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Hi Folks,

Not strictly a confocal question, but I am wondering if researchers are
still purchasing traditional "video"
cameras (i.e. Vidicon / Newvicon electronic imaging devices).  My
impression is that CCDs can now do everything the old-style video camera
could do, and offer important advantages (such as quantum efficiency,
linearity and dynamic range).  But I am just wondering if there are any
imaging niches where the tube style
cameras are surviving?    I would expect that many of
these instruments are still in use-- they provided many great movies of
living cells and organelles over the years!
But are researchers still buying them?

thanks for any comments,
Don

p.s.  And I still owe the list a bibliography...which will
   hopefully emerge from the chaos of my life!

Donald M. O'Malley
Associate Professor
Dept. Biology
Northeastern University

This email (including any attachments) may contain 
confidential and/or legally privileged information and is 
intended only to be read or used by the addressee.  If you 
are not the intended addressee, any use, distribution, 
disclosure or copying of this email is strictly 
prohibited.  
Confidentiality and legal privilege attached to this email 
(including any attachments) are not waived or lost by 
reason of its mistaken delivery to you.
If you have received this email in error, please delete it 
and notify us immediately by telephone or email.  Peter 
MacCallum Cancer Centre provides no guarantee that this 
transmission is free of virus or that it has not been 
intercepted or altered and will not be liable for any delay 
in its receipt.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2