*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

Hi Michelle,

We use both programs here - for acquisition as well as analysis.  I 
agree with much of what has been said so far, but I would like to add 
one other great thing about MetaMorph on the acquisition side - it is 
extremely flexible when it comes to controlling new hardware, in fact 
the guys at the company have written at least three new drivers for 
different cameras or whatever when we have asked for their help.  The 
larger companies, such as Nikon, will probably write the necessary 
drivers eventually but I have been very impressed by the speed of 
response from the MM guys.

All the best,
Alison


On 3/12/2012 8:28 PM, Michelle Aloni wrote:
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> *****
>
> Dear all,
>
> If any one of you had already compared MetaMorph (we have 7.6 version) with
> the NIKON Elements software I would appreciate it very much if you share
> with me your opinion.
>
> If you used both of them, how do they compare? Which one would be your
> personal choice and why?
>
> Thank you ahead of time
>
> Michelle Aloni MS, HTL (ASCP)
> Research Specialist
> USC Keck School of Medicine

-- 
Alison J. North, Ph.D.,
Research Associate Professor and
Senior Director of the Bio-Imaging Resource Center,
The Rockefeller University,
1230 York Avenue,
New York,
NY 10065.
Tel: office	++ 212 327 7488
Tel: lab    	++ 212 327 7486
Fax:        	++ 212 327 7489