Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 16 Jan 2013 21:41:18 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****
Hello All,
Thanks for all replies!
Here is a quick summary wrote by my senior colleague and I hope his summary
will clarify some questions. "I have been using the standard deviation of a dark
area as the noise, the average of the dark area as a background and the average
of a high signal area as the ˇ°maxˇ± (SNR=(Max-Min)/noise). I have checked, the
min and noise in min figures are the same in the completely dark region of my
sample as they are in a truly dark image. The gain on the EM is 255 and the
amplifier is 5. I am guessing a total gain of 550-750 which puts the photon count
per pixel somewhere between 40-60." Under the condition of 40-60 photons,
EMCCD SNR is 46, much higher than 12 on sCMOS.
I had a phone call with Hamamatsu technical support today, based on their
experiment, the EMCCD should have a higher SNR once the signal is higher than 6-
15 photons. However, our results have big disagreement with them. Something
must be wrong, either our measurement or either the camera. So we send our
original data to Hamamatsu for further investigation. I will keep you updated once
I hear something from Hamamatsu.
Ps, the EMCCD we used is also from Hamamatsu (c9100-13).
Thanks a lot, Zulin
|
|
|