*****
To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
*****

Hi Adrian,

One thing you may want to check is the position of the bottom of the wells 
compare to the plastic frame. The greigner's one I had first were not 
flush  with the frame and thus I had issues with the objective touching 
the frame when imaging the wells on the edge. So I always had to sacrifice 
the edge wells and decided to switch to the Matrical plates.

Best
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Jean-Pierre CLAMME, PhD
Chief Scientist
Nitto Denko Technical
501 Via Del Monte
Oceanside, CA 92058
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
Phone: 1-760-696-9428


Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]> wrote on 
06/21/2012 02:02:54 AM:

> Adrian Smith <[log in to unmask]> 
> Sent by: Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
> 
> 06/21/2012 02:05 AM
> 
> Please respond to
> Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
> 
> To
> 
> [log in to unmask]
> 
> cc
> 
> Subject
> 
> Glass bottom 96 well plates for hi-res imaging
> 
> *****
> To join, leave or search the confocal microscopy listserv, go to:
> http://lists.umn.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A0=confocalmicroscopy
> *****

> Hi all,

> We have a user who is after some 96well plates for hi-res imaging, 
> ie coverslip thickness (glass?).

> Any comments/recommendations would be appreciated.

> Regards,

> Adrian Smith
> Centenary Institute, Sydney, Australia