CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

June 1994

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Dr. Shanti J. Aggarwal" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 27 Jun 1994 15:24:56 +22301144
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
 >in response to Vibration isolation tables:
We tried a granite base with a 8inch thick polyfoam base. It was satisfactory only in some situations. Since our laboratory is located on the 6th floor and directlt below airconditioning equipment etc. a vibration free table was imperative.We are very happy with a TMC product.
Shanti Aggarwal
Biomedical Enginering
U T at Austin, Tx
[log in to unmask]
 
> We also have a Newport Vibration Isolated table under our confocal
> microscope. However it is the high centre of mass creating a "hunting"
> problem which we can only just rectify by pressure and valve needle
> adjustments. Would buying the heavier duty Newport table have minimised
> this problem?  Vis a vis Peter McHardy's point we have reduced vibration to
> the laser unit from the attached heat exhaust piping by inserting a thick
> but flexible material sleeve between the exhaust port on the laser head and
> the exhaust duct. We have also suspended the exhaust piping from heavy duty
> rubber bands in an attempt to introduce a damping effect on any vibrations
> being transmitted to the laser head.
>                 yours, Colin
>
>
>
>
> The Hielander
> Colin Macqueen      [log in to unmask]
> Confocal Facility   The University of Queensland
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2