CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

March 2008

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kirill Ukhanov <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 10 Mar 2008 09:29:02 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Dear Hege,

GFP could be quenched by aldehyde fixation, on the other hand you need to
fix the tissue to avoid wash out of GFP as it is mostly located in cytoplasm
(well, depending how its expression is controlled). Poor fixation may result
in a loss of the GFP from the tissue even if you think of not using
permeabilization etc. I would recommend fixing your tissue before
cryosectioning and then use anti-GFP antibody to enhance native GFP (if you
find the signal too weak). I remember I found an extensive discussion on
this issue here in the list or elsewhere in microscopy forums.

good luck

Kirill Ukhanov
University of Florida

On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 16:22:06 +0100, Hege Avsnes Dale
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>Search the CONFOCAL archive at
>http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>
>Hi.
>Do anyone have a protocol for good preservation of GFP in tissue after
>freeze sectioning?
>The tissue is a tumor with EGFP-expressing cells and need only a
>fixation that will preserve GFP (no permabilization  needed). Would it
>also be a better idea to fix before sectioning?
>
>Hege
>=========================================================================

ATOM RSS1 RSS2