Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 30 Oct 2009 15:45:18 +1100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On 27/10/2009, at 1:39 PM, Chris Tully wrote:
> 3) Having worked in a Class 1000 clean room lab that was always
> under a slight positive pressure, there are pluses and minuses. On
> the plus side, almost no dust ever built up in side the positive
> pressure rooms. On the down side we had to go through an air lock
> room to avoid too strong of a draft out of the lab. We did have
> special synthetic fiber lab coats (no bunny suites) and we each had
> to bring in a pair of all leather shoes to keep in the locker room
> for use exclusively in the clean room. The upside for a micro
> facility would be less time spent cleaning dust off of equipment and
> worrying about dust covers. You could achieve all of this by
> specifying an ISO 6 (Formerly Class 1000) clean room. Even if you
> allowed people to come an go in street clothes/shoes, keeping a
> fresh sticky mat at the entrance would keep street dirt to a minimum
> and the filtering implied by a ISO 6 would help a lot too. Of
> course this would up the cost a bit...
Positive pressure would seem to be problem if there potentially
biohazardous samples being imaged?
Regards,
Adrian
|
|
|