CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

August 2008

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kurt Thorn <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 4 Aug 2008 11:43:20 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (46 lines)
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

I can't see how PBS can contribute any fluorescence at all.  Neither 
phosphate nor NaCl should be fluorescent at all, and I've routinely used 
phosphate buffers for fluorimetry measurements.

Kurt

Guillermo Palchik wrote:
> Search the CONFOCAL archive at
> http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>
> Dear Confocalists,
>
> I have been trying to locate a paper I had read a few years ago 
> regarding the use of TBS rather than PBS for IHC, since it reduces the 
> level of background fluorescence associated with the PBS. Does anybody 
> know what paper I am referring to?
> In addition, does anybody have any insight into whether this is 
> actually true? I mean, if I do my IHC with PBS and then wash it off 
> with dH20, isn't this getting rid of most of the PBS background 
> fluorescence?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gil Palchik
>
> [log in to unmask]
>


-- 
Kurt Thorn, PhD
Director, Nikon Imaging Center
University of California San Francisco

UCSF MC 2140
Genentech Hall Room S252
600 16th St.
San Francisco, CA 94158-2517

http://nic.ucsf.edu
phone 415.514.9709
fax   415.514.4300

ATOM RSS1 RSS2