Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 4 Aug 2008 11:43:20 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
I can't see how PBS can contribute any fluorescence at all. Neither
phosphate nor NaCl should be fluorescent at all, and I've routinely used
phosphate buffers for fluorimetry measurements.
Kurt
Guillermo Palchik wrote:
> Search the CONFOCAL archive at
> http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>
> Dear Confocalists,
>
> I have been trying to locate a paper I had read a few years ago
> regarding the use of TBS rather than PBS for IHC, since it reduces the
> level of background fluorescence associated with the PBS. Does anybody
> know what paper I am referring to?
> In addition, does anybody have any insight into whether this is
> actually true? I mean, if I do my IHC with PBS and then wash it off
> with dH20, isn't this getting rid of most of the PBS background
> fluorescence?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gil Palchik
>
> [log in to unmask]
>
--
Kurt Thorn, PhD
Director, Nikon Imaging Center
University of California San Francisco
UCSF MC 2140
Genentech Hall Room S252
600 16th St.
San Francisco, CA 94158-2517
http://nic.ucsf.edu
phone 415.514.9709
fax 415.514.4300
|
|
|