CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

January 1997

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Cork, Robert, John" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 29 Jan 1997 10:51:57 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
At 08:59 AM 1/29/97 -0500, you wrote:
>Hi
>
>I was following the a discussion in the Confocal archives around 3/95
regarding deconvolution of images.  It was said at one point that to
accurately deconvolve an image, the complete system must be known.  Does
anyone know what exactly must be "known", how one goes about getting that
information, and is there software that can take that information to deblur
or deconvolve an image?
>
Hello,
There are a number of variations for deconvolution algorithms but they all
basically need information about the objective (N.A., working distance) and
the microscope setup,( refractive index of the medium wavelength of light
used etc.). All  of these fators affect a function called the point spread
function which describes how the image obtained from  a single point source
will appear.  There are various ways of calculating a PSF either
theoretically or empirically using fluorescent beads. For more details see
some of the papers by Agard (e.g. Meth. Cell Biol. (30), 353-377)
or Ann. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. (13), 191-219).
I also have a paper that describes some of these methods and software to
calculate the PSF (Meth. Cell Biol. (40), 221-240).
Hope this helps
Dr. John Cork,
Calcium Imaging Facility
Department of Anatomy, LSUMC,
1901 Perdido St., New Orleans
LA 70112

e-mail: [log in to unmask]
tel: (504) 568 7059         FAX: (504) 568 4392

ATOM RSS1 RSS2