CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

January 2001

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kirk Czymmek <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 18 Jan 2001 15:18:37 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
        Has anybody ever experienced etching of the metal or glue holding the
lenses in an objective lens by salt solutions? We have a researcher who has
been using up to 1M NaOH solutions in perfusion experiments for the last
year. Occasional minor leakage occurred early on, which caused some
corrosion at the base of the objective lens. We have stopped the leakage and
have devised a way to prevent any solution getting down the body of the
objective lens or elsewhere on the microscope. Last fall I noticed that the
light throughput just didn't seem to be as high and now it has become
terrible. This, of course, was my most expensive lens, 63X C-Apochromat NA
1.2.. I am suspicious of the salt solutions because we only use distilled
H2O on this objective otherwise. The edge of the front lens element seems a
bit irregular compared to the other lenses. I don't know enough about how
these lenses are put together to determine if this is even possible. I just
don't want to switch to a new objective and have the same thing happen.
Also, I do have a call in to the manufacturer, but was wondering if others
might have had a similar experience. Thanks in advance for any thoughts.

Regards, Kirk


Kirk J. Czymmek, Ph.D.
Associate Professor
Department of Biological Sciences
Delaware Biotechnology Institute Bio-Imaging Center, Director
University of Delaware
Newark, DE 19716
(302) 831-1158

ATOM RSS1 RSS2