Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
quoted-printable |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 8 Aug 2003 15:43:26 +0200 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
Hi list,
We are getting down to the nitty-gritty of ordering a new system and some rather interesting options are possible, but I do not recall seeing them aired so far in the list.
One is the 594nm HeNe "orange laser", which is touted by Leica to fill the gap between the other commonly-used excitation lines. Has anyone experience to report, good or bad regarding this laser?
Both Zeiss and Leica offer the possibility of storing/replaying user-defined command sequences by means of an optional software macro editor. Since this is a software "extra", has anyone experience of the advantages or foibles of running macros. Is a macro-loaded software version inherently more unwieldy and slower-running than the same program without this facility. I assume that the code incorporating macros must contain lots of connection points/links accessible to say Microsoft Visual Basic, which might have the effect of reducing system speed? Could it become a problem when fast collection of physiological data is needed? By the way, does anyone seriously use the macro feature?
Cheers and TIA,
Jim
|
|
|