CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

December 2003

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Donnelly, Tom" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 3 Dec 2003 07:43:18 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (68 lines)
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Here are two more references which go back a few years but are quite good.

N.S. White et. al.

"Aberration control in quantitave imaging of botanical specimens by
multidimensional fluorescence microscopy"
Journal of Microscopy Vol 181, Pt. 2, February 1996 pp. 99-116 (Royal
Microscopy Society)

" Multidimensional Fluorescence Microscopy: Optical Distortions in
Quantitative Imaging of Biological Specimens"
Fluorescent Microscopy and Fluorescent Probes, Plenum Press, New York,
1996  pp. 47-56


Regards,

Tom

 Tom Donnelly          Applied Precision, LLC
 Biotechnology Group   1040 12th Ave. N.W.
 (425)657-1294         Issaquah, WA 98027-8929
 (425)557-1055 fax     [log in to unmask]                 http://www.api.com/lifescience/spectris.html

  

-----Original Message-----
From: Stefan Gunnarsson [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 1:41 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: RI mismatch?


Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Hi!
We have been looking at rather thick sections of tissue, cut at 30-35 
microns, stained with propidium iodide, and mounted with DABCO mount 
(which I assume has RI around glycerol).
With a 20x/0.7NA Imm lens with glycerol as immersion medium, the 
z-distance between top and bottom of the section (as measured by the 
fine focus device on the microscope) was the expected 30-35 microns.
With a 40x/0.7NA dry lens, however, the same distance was only around 
20 microns.
The decrease in signal intensity away from the cover slip was slight in 
both cases, but a little bit more pronounced with the 40x lens.
My immediate thought was that this was an example on RI mismatch, but 
the clever student objected, since the distance was actually measured 
with the step motor on the microscope. ("A stick in the lake will only 
seem to be bent, if actually measured with a meter the true distance to 
the surface will be revealed").

Could someone please shed some light on this....

tia,
Stefan
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Dr Stefan Gunnarsson
Evolutionsbiologiskt Centrum                    Evolutionary Biology Centre
Enheten för biologisk strukturanalys          Microscopy and Imaging Unit
Norbyvägen 18A                                	
SE75236 Uppsala, Sweden                 Tel &  Fax: +46 - 18471 2638
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

ATOM RSS1 RSS2