CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

September 2004

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Date:
Wed, 22 Sep 2004 16:45:38 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

My suggestion would be to forget about apos; even though
Olympus did make some UV compatible ones they aren't likely
to be common.  Just use an ordinary plan-fluor lens and you
should get quite enough transmission at 340.  And it won't
cost you nearly as much!

                                                 Guy Cox

Dr I F Gow wrote:

> Search the CONFOCAL archive at
> http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>
> Hi - not strictly confocal, but maybe one day....we have an old Olympus
> IMT2 we use for Ca measurements using fura2, but the 340 attenuation is
> impossible.  I've trawled the web looking for a x40 dplan apo uv lens but
> no luck.  Are there any equivalent lenses which would work on this which
> are still available such as Zeiss or even russian ones?
>
> regards
>
> iain

ATOM RSS1 RSS2