Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 23 May 2006 16:57:46 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
We recently purchased anti-PCNA (and the corresponding blocking peptide) for
use as a marker of cell proliferation. Mouse proximal tubule cells (renal
epithelial cells) were grown on collagen-coated chamber slides or
semipermeable supports. Cells were fixed, treated with 10 mM citrate, pH 6,
(for antigen retrieval), permeabilized, and incubated with anti-PCNA (1:100)
followed by an AlexaFluor-IgG conjugate. Immunofluorescence showed that most
of the immunoreactive material (approximately 80%) was localized to the
cytosol, and only 10 - 20% was found in the nucleus. The blocking peptide
effectively competed away about 80% of the immunofluorescence. --- The
expectation was that most of the immunoreactive material would be found in
the nuclei of actively dividing cells and thus serve as a suitable marker of
proliferation. Only a small amount, if any, was expected in the cytosol. Can
you help explain my results? Alternatively, can you suggest another marker
for cell proliferation?
Thanks,
Phil
|
|
|