Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 17 Nov 2006 08:50:32 +1030 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
There is a third way (at least!) Li Liu.
Fix with an aldehyde based fixative and then permeablise with DMSO or a
mild solvent like ethanol. This procedure is routinely used in
neuroscience where you need to preserve the 3D structure of single
neurons, for example. Compared with using a detergent, you get a lot
less tissue distortion and damage: probably more of an issue in
sections rather than cells growing on coverslips, but worth keeping in
mind. Our experience is similar to tothers in that once the cells are
just fixed, you can get some level of antibody penetration already...
IAN
On Friday, November 17, 2006, at 01:39 AM, Li Liu wrote:
> Search the CONFOCAL archive at
> http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
> Greetings!
>
> I have a question about how to fix cells:
> I need to label a plasma membrane protein with Alex488, and get images
> with confocal microscopy, and I need the membrane to be permeablized.
> I was told there are two ways to do it: either fix the cell with 2%
> paraformaldehyde then permeablize the membrane with Triton; or fix the
> cell with 100% methanol then don’t have to permeablize the membrane
> since methanol will make holes on the membrane.
>
> But for the best labeling of a membrane protein and get the best image
> under the confocal microscopy, which one is better: fix cell with
> paraformaldehyde or pure methanol?
>
* * * * * * * * * * *
Prof Ian Gibbins
Anatomy & Histology
Flinders University
GPO Box 2100
Adelaide SA 5001
AUSTRALIA
[log in to unmask]
voice: +61-8-8204 5271
fax: +61-8-8277 0085
http://som.flinders.edu.au/FUSA/Anatomy/
http://www.flinders.edu.au/neuroscience
|
|
|