CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

January 2007

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Vickery Trinkaus-Randall <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 4 Jan 2007 09:53:08 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (95 lines)
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

hello
We would like to compare the two instruments as we were looking at 
writing a grant for a LIVE.
Vickery Trinkaus-Randall
Biochemistry
Boston University School of Medicine

David Knecht wrote:

> Search the CONFOCAL archive at
> http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>
> In response to Jens's comments, we have been working with actin  
> binding protein indirect labeling of F-actin for many years (I think  
> we were the first to do it: Pang, et al. (1998) Current Biology  
> 8:405) and we are about to submit a paper to show that some, but not  
> all probes do in fact alter actin dynamics.
> As to spinning disk, our recent tests show the recent iteration of  
> the Zeiss 5Live to be as good as, and in some way better than  
> spinning disk for maintaining viability of cells and for speed for 2  
> channel imaging.  Anyone else done this comparison?  Dave
>
> Dr. David Knecht
> Department of Molecular and Cell Biology
> U-3125
> 91 N. Eagleville Rd.
> University of Connecticut
> Storrs, CT 06269
> 860-486-2200
> 860-486-4331 (fax)
>
>
> On Jan 3, 2007, at 4:10 AM, Rietdorf, Jens wrote:
>
>> Search the CONFOCAL archive at
>> http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>>
>> Dear Mark and others,
>> (happy new year!)
>>
>> Be aware, fp-fusions change cytoskeleton dynamics (at least for  
>> tubulin). We compared growth and shrinkage rates to other labeling  
>> methods.
>>
>> Colombelli J, Reynaud EG, Rietdorf J, Pepperkok R, Stelzer EH. In  
>> vivo selective cytoskeleton dynamics quantification in interphase  
>> cells induced by pulsed ultraviolet laser nanosurgery. Traffic.  2005 
>> Dec;6(12):1093-102.
>>
>> The protein used to label actin (mentioned in other postings) to my  
>> knowledge is a construct consisting of lim domains that bind to and  
>> thereby indirectly label actin filaments. It would be interesting  to 
>> see if binding of this construct to the filaments changes actin  
>> dynamics.
>> Fischer, M., Haase, I., Simmeth, E., Gerisch, G. and MuĻ ller-
>> Taubenberger, A. (2004) A brilliant monomeric red fluorescent
>> protein to visualize cytoskeleton dynamics in Dictyostelium. FEBS
>> Lett. 577, 227-232.
>>
>> To improve visualisation, TIRF is the imaging method of choice for  
>> adherent cells. Otherwise use Yokogawa disk.
>>
>> regards, jens
>>
>> ---
>> Dr. Jens Rietdorf
>> head of microscopy unit
>> Friedrich-Miescher-Institute, wro1066.2.32
>> Maulbeerstr.66, CH-4058 Basel, Switzerland
>> phone +41(61)69-75172 mobil +41 798284737
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Confocal Microscopy List  
>> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Marc Thibault
>> Sent: Mittwoch, 20. Dezember 2006 22:23
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: live cell
>>
>> Search the CONFOCAL archive at
>> http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal
>>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Does anyone one know of commercially available GFP (or other FP's)  
>> tagged cells, with a preference for cytoskeletal tagged proteins ?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Marc
>
>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2