CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

April 2007

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Thomas E. Phillips" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 24 Apr 2007 09:14:30 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

Our imaging facility is considering acquiring a spinning disk confocal to 
compliment our 2 laser scanning instruments (Radiance 2000, Zeiss 510 NLO 
META).  The leading configurations are the Yokogawa and Olympus DSU units 
with an EMCCD.  I would appreciate insight on the following issues:  Are 
service contracts on the spinning disk unit or EMCCD essential (I have them 
on my LSMs)?  For those of you running core facilities, does the spinning 
disk siphon a significant proportion of users off the LSMs or do you find 
its use restricted to live cell/fast acquisition studies?  And finally, how 
much does going with laser excitation really improve things over the use of 
a mercury arc or metal halide illumination source?  Thanks for any comments 
you have on this. Tom

Thomas E. Phillips, PhD
Professor of Biological Sciences
Director, Molecular Cytology Core
2 Tucker Hall
University of Missouri
Columbia, MO 65211-7400

573-882-4712 (office)
573-882-0123 (fax)
[log in to unmask]
http://www.biology.missouri.edu/faculty/phillips.html
http://www.biotech.missouri.edu/mcc/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2