CONFOCALMICROSCOPY Archives

February 2008

CONFOCALMICROSCOPY@LISTS.UMN.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pedro J Camello <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Confocal Microscopy List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 3 Feb 2008 16:14:35 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (42 lines)
Search the CONFOCAL archive at
http://listserv.acsu.buffalo.edu/cgi-bin/wa?S1=confocal

I´m trying to set a Biorad 1024 (Nikon 60x, oil) to get optical slices of
labelled cells. Using a sample of 200 nm fluorescent beads I got Z
resolution of 327 nm (average of 6 beads, range 110 to 520 nm) with the
minimum iris (0.7).

My first question is: if I want to make 1 µ optical slices, should I get
the resolution for higher iris aperture untill I get 1 µ axial resolution?
(I´ve recorded vertical sections for the same beads from 0.7 to 8 iris
apertute)

The other question is about the axial (vertical) images generated by the
confocal. I expected to get an elliptical image for each bead, stretching
from top to bottom of the image. However, the lowest part of each bead is
shifted to the right, so that the fluorescent ellipses are slightly
tilted. It is supposed that the microscope is correctly aligned (the laser
has been recently replaced and the engineer from Zeiss checked
everything). If alignment is fine, could be that internal settings
regarding magnification and objetive are wrong? I made the measurements
using square pixels, but this feature depends on numbers entered in the
settings by the engineer.

I would appreciate some help for this artifact before starting real
experiments.

Thanks in advance.

Pedro


-- 
Dr Pedro J Camello
Dpt Physiology
Faculty of Veterinary Sciences
University of Extremadura
10071 Caceres
Spain
Ph: 927257100 Extension 1321
Fax:927257110

ATOM RSS1 RSS2